The Tagging Era Is Over :Why Proposal Teams Are Leaving Loopio for Anchor

Most proposal automation tools weren’t built for how RFPs work today.

If you’re using Loopio or another legacy content library platform, you’ve probably felt it: tagging fatigue, update overhead, and AI that sounds more like ChatGPT than your team.

In this post, we’ll explain why tagging-era tools are breaking down and what modern AI-native proposal tools, like Anchor, are doing differently.

Why Traditional Proposal Software Like Loopio Is Breaking Down

You don’t need a better content library. You need to leave the library behind.

Over the past decade, proposal teams were sold a dream that you'd tag your content, build a single source of truth, and respond to RFPs with ease. Tools like Loopio promised structure, visibility, and control, right?

And to be fair, they delivered for a while.

But the way companies buy, the way teams sell, and the way we respond to and win proposals have evolved.

If you’re still maintaining a tagging-based library in 2025, you’re trying to solve a speed problem with a filing system.

It's never really worked for anyone, and now it is, quite luckily, unnecessary.

The Real Problem with Loopio and Other Legacy Tools

Most proposal software today operates under the same outdated assumption:

Content libraries are the center of the proposal universe.

Loopio is built entirely around this belief.

It’s a content management solution, with 'AI' bolted on. But what we’re seeing is this model is collapsing under real-world demands:

• RFP volume has grown 3x in many orgs
• Proposal managers are outnumbered
• SMEs don’t have time to log in, review, or update content
• Buyers expect deep personalization, not templated, generic answers

This isn’t just a content reuse problem anymore. It’s a collaboration, qualification, and velocity problem.

And you can’t tag your way out of that.

Feature Comparison: Anchor vs. Loopio (2025 Proposal Tools)

CategoryLoopio (Tagging-Era Tools)Anchor (AI-Native Proposal Platform)Content OrganizationManually tagged libraryDynamic AI memoryRFP QualificationManual reviewAutomated, customizable qualificationDrafting ResponsesPull from tagged answersWrite from diverse source contextSME CollaborationLog in & reviewUse async via SlackSetup Time4–6 weeks< 2 weeksMaintenance RequiredConstantMinimal

Anchor: The AI Proposal Tool Built for Speed, Accuracy, and Scale

Anchor doesn’t compete with Loopio feature-for-feature because it isn’t in the same category.

Loopio is a tagging-era RFP library tool. Anchor is an AI-native proposal platform.

It’s built from the ground up to answer a new question:

“How do we use intelligence to win more proposals with fewer people?”

Where Loopio stores content, Anchor interprets it.Where Loopio needs tagging, Anchor learns context.Where Loopio starts after you say yes to an RFP, Anchor helps you decide if it’s worth it in the first place.

What Real Teams Are Saying About Loopio

We spoke to a SaaS company fielding over 350 RFPs per year. Their setup looked like this:

• 3 proposal managers
• 8+ Slack channels (just for proposals)
• A Loopio library that couldn’t stay updated, despite their best efforts
• More time spent re-writing halluncinations than writing a first draft on their own
• SMEs too busy to log in
• A knowledge base that was technically "complete," but functionally useless

Their comment to us:

“We’re spending more time updating Loopio than actually answering RFPs.”

They didn’t need a better library. They needed a system that thinks.

Why Tagging-Based Proposal Tools Don’t Scale

1. Tagging Doesn’t Scale with Complexity

As your team and content library grow, the tagging structure becomes a liability. Tags drift, answers get duplicated, and AI starts hallucinating. You end up rewriting everything anyway.

2. SMEs Are Treated Like Admins

Legacy tools force SMEs to act like librarians. They don’t have time for it, and they won’t log in just to babysit a content system on top of their already-busy day job.

3. AI Is an Afterthought

Bolt-on AI can’t:

• Pull from multiple sources
• Understand tone or deal context
• Cite sources reliably

A confidence score isn’t helpful if the output is still wrong.

How Anchor Replaces Tagging with AI Context

Anchor starts from a different assumption:

The content exists, and your people are busy, so the AI should do the heavy admin lifting.

So Anchor:

• Parses RFPs (PDFs, Excel, portals)
• Scores them based on ICP fit and red flags
• Drafts answers using your docs, CRM, and content
• Cites its sources in every response
• Learns from every submission

There isn’t a tagging feature, because modern AI doesn’t need one.

This is proposal automation that actually feels automatic.

Is Anchor Right for You? Signs You’ve Outgrown Legacy Tools

If any of these sound familiar:

• You’re handling 50+ RFPs per year
• Your SMEs won’t log in to review content
• Your response speed is slipping
• Your win rate is flat
• Your AI tool sounds generic or hallucinates

Then you’ve likely outgrown Loopio and similar platforms.

Anchor is built for proposal teams who need to scale without adding more headcount.

Choosing Between Legacy Proposal Software and AI-Native Platforms

Right now, choosing a proposal tech tool is kinda like choosing your future.

Future #1 (Tagging Era):

• Keep tagging content
• Non-step Slack SMEs for updates
• Reformat every RFP manually
• Watch AI feel like hype

Future #2 (AI-Native):

• Let the AI write a first draft from scratch
• Free SMEs to focus only on edge cases
• Eliminate redundant content reviews
• Win faster with less work

Anchor isn’t better inside Loopio’s category.

It’s why the old category is collapsing.

Frequently Asked Questions About AI Proposal Tools

Q: What is an AI-native proposal platform?
A: It’s a system that understands your content and RFPs in context, meaning no tagging required. It retrieves, writes, and improves with every deal.

Q: Why are teams leaving Loopio and similar tools?
A: Because tagging-based libraries don’t scale, SME engagement is low, and most AI features feel bolted-on.

Q: How is Anchor different from Loopio?
A: Anchor eliminates tagging, supports async SME collaboration, drafts accurate responses with citations, and starts with qualification.

Q: Does Anchor require a content migration?
A: No. It learns from your docs, CRM, and past proposals automatically.

Ready to See the Difference?

Anchor isn’t another content library with a GPT button.

It’s a full-stack proposal engine built for revenue teams who are tired of tagging, chasing SMEs, and rewriting the same answers.

Want to see it in action?

• ✅ Book a live demo with our team
• ✅ Or upload your last RFP—we’ll show you how Anchor would’ve handled it

Book a demo!

‍